Why 73% of Patients Don't Complete Their Home Exercise Programs (And What Actually Works)

Jennifer arrived at her six-week follow-up after a knee replacement with a hesitant smile. When asked how her home exercises were going, she responded, “Pretty well, I think.” But a few more questions revealed the truth: she had done them only three times in the past two weeks.

This story is not unusual. In fact, it’s the norm. Research shows that around 73 percent of patients fail to follow their home exercise programs as prescribed. That failure has serious consequences, from slower recoveries to poorer long-term outcomes. But most of the time, it’s not about laziness. It’s about design.

The Real Reasons Patients Struggle

Home programs are often too complex. A typical prescription includes eight to twelve exercises, each with specific sets, reps, and progression guidelines. Clinically, this feels comprehensive. Psychologically, it’s overwhelming. Behavioral research suggests most people can manage only three or four new habits at once. More than that, and patients often give up before they begin.

Compounding the issue is the lack of feedback. In the clinic, patients are coached and corrected. At home, they’re guessing. They don’t know if they’re doing it right, if the intensity is appropriate, or if they’re making progress. Without guidance, confidence and motivation drop quickly.

Motivation itself is frequently misunderstood. Educating patients on the importance of exercise is necessary, but it rarely changes behavior on its own. Many patients know what they’re supposed to do. That doesn’t mean they’re able to do it consistently, especially in the absence of support.

Then there’s the issue of isolation. During recovery, patients often go from active communities or fitness routines to exercising alone. That drop in social accountability makes habits harder to maintain, especially when routines feel monotonous or discouraging.

What’s at Stake for Patients and Practices

Poor adherence can double recovery timelines. A six-week plan can stretch into three months, frustrating patients and burdening providers. It also increases the risk of complications like joint stiffness, muscle loss, or chronic pain. Patients who fall behind are more likely to be readmitted or need additional care.

These setbacks affect long-term outcomes and satisfaction scores. Patients who keep up with their exercises early in recovery tend to maintain better function over time. They also speak positively about their care experience. On the flip side, poor adherence can tarnish a practice’s reputation, especially when outcomes fall short of expectations.

Why Most Traditional Approaches Fall Short

Handouts with generic instructions are still the most common delivery method for home programs. But they’re one-size-fits-all and lack any mechanism for feedback or progress tracking. Practices that lean on YouTube videos or basic apps often assume too much about patients’ tech comfort or internet access.

Standardized programs that ignore personal preferences and living situations rarely connect with patients. A 75-year-old in a small apartment has different needs than a 45-year-old with a home gym. Yet many HEPs treat them the same.

Most concerning is the reliance on self-reporting. Patients tend to overestimate how often they exercise or say what they think their provider wants to hear. And when there’s no follow-up or support, even motivated patients tend to drift away from their routines.

What Actually Works

Successful programs keep things simple at the start. Beginning with two or three essential exercises builds confidence and creates early wins. Complexity is added only after the patient has demonstrated consistency.

Progress needs to be visible and measured. Patients should know what success looks like—whether that’s more reps, increased range of motion, or reduced pain. Regular check-ins, even if brief and virtual, reinforce accountability and give providers a chance to course-correct when needed.

Personalization is also key. Programs that match a patient’s fitness level, equipment, space, and preferences are far more likely to be followed. A few thoughtful adjustments at the start can dramatically improve long-term engagement.

Support from family or caregivers helps too. Patients who share their goals and track their progress with others tend to stick with it longer. Even a simple conversation each evening about what was completed can make a difference.

Technology can play a major role when it enhances rather than complicates the experience. The most effective tools are easy to navigate, provide clear feedback, and offer a direct line to the care team. They don’t require a patient to learn a whole new system, but instead fit into their daily routine with minimal friction.

Beyond Exercises: Tracking What Matters

Great programs go beyond asking whether the patient did their exercises. They track how the patient feels, what progress they’re seeing, and how daily life is changing. That includes functional milestones like walking further or climbing stairs, but also broader indicators like sleep quality, mood, or energy.

Patients are more motivated when they see how their efforts are improving their lives. The more clearly they can connect the work they’re doing to the way they feel, the more likely they are to stick with it.

Sustaining Long-Term Behavior Change

The ultimate goal isn’t just short-term compliance. It’s sustainable behavior change. That means applying what we know from habit science—start small, link new routines to existing ones, and build in environmental cues. Whether it’s placing a resistance band near the coffee maker or setting a recurring calendar alert, small nudges build consistency.

Intrinsic motivation also matters. When patients feel ownership over their recovery and see the personal benefits of staying active, they become more independent. Teaching them how to navigate challenges, adapt routines, and solve problems ensures their habits hold even when circumstances change.

Technology Done Right

The right platform doesn’t just deliver exercises. It keeps patients engaged, makes feedback visible, and provides connection with their care team when needed. But the best solutions are simple. If it takes more effort to use the platform than to do the exercises, it’s a problem.

The balance between automation and human touch is critical. Reminders and tracking tools can handle the routine, while staff focus on motivation, support, and smart adjustments.

Measuring Success

Improving adherence isn’t just about doing better for patients—it’s about tracking it. Practices need to monitor not only whether exercises are being completed, but how outcomes are changing. That includes measuring adherence rates, functional progress, patient satisfaction, and clinic efficiency.

High-performing programs reduce recovery timelines, improve patient outcomes, and lower overall costs. They also create a better experience, which drives more referrals and builds trust in the community.

A New Standard for HEPs

The 73 percent failure rate doesn’t have to be the norm. Practices that design smarter, more supportive, and more personalized programs will see better results. As patient expectations rise and value-based care becomes more central, this shift is no longer optional.

Patients want to do well. They want to recover quickly, avoid setbacks, and get back to their lives. But they need the right tools and the right support to do it. Practices that take this seriously will not only improve outcomes, but also stand out for the quality of care they provide.

*Disclaimer: Any names or characters mentioned in Orva blog posts are fictional and used solely for illustrative purposes.

Ready to transform your practice's approach to home exercise programs and dramatically improve patient adherence rates? Learn how leading orthopedic and physical therapy clinics are using Orva to drive better outcomes and unlock new revenue opportunities.